I made a suggestion on page 9 of this thread about posting a reminder to faithful dubs about the society's direction regarding not posting on these types of blogs.
Well after rereading the article in The Independent, I realized that that direction was already reposted there by the writer of the article.
So if these apologists have read this, and are aware of it, and attended the meeting that discussed it, how can they brazenly condemn "apostates" of having their own ideas, while going contrary 'to the the things they have been taught' by responding to that article?
My two cents. ***Confusion suddenly sets in***
CoC